Editing Add-on etiquette

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 11: Line 11:
 
==Don't make people install your add-on before they read the important notes==
 
==Don't make people install your add-on before they read the important notes==
 
If you overwrite files or have special install instructions, let the user see the readme or the installation instructions first and then install it. That's especially important if you have special terms of use.  
 
If you overwrite files or have special install instructions, let the user see the readme or the installation instructions first and then install it. That's especially important if you have special terms of use.  
 
==Don't overwrite files from Orbiter's base distribution==
 
It's OK to include a line about how to put a [[Surface base|base]] on a [[Planet|planet]] and let the player himself figure it out how to do this. But very often such modifications damage the base orbiter installation and make it impossible to run the default scenarios.  You don't need to do this, so avoid it. If you replace a file from orbiter, make sure the add-on works with all default scenarios. 
 
  
 
==Don't overwrite files from other add-ons==  
 
==Don't overwrite files from other add-ons==  
Line 20: Line 17:
 
==[[Bug report|Bug reports]] are good==
 
==[[Bug report|Bug reports]] are good==
 
Don't get angry if somebody reports only the bugs of your add-on instead of writing a good review. You did not find these bugs before releasing it, so it's your own fault that somebody can even post the bug reports. Also such bug reports are posted for improving your add-on, because somebody is really interested in it.
 
Don't get angry if somebody reports only the bugs of your add-on instead of writing a good review. You did not find these bugs before releasing it, so it's your own fault that somebody can even post the bug reports. Also such bug reports are posted for improving your add-on, because somebody is really interested in it.
 
==Use names and filenames that make sense==
 
That's normally no big problem, but especially when two add-ons simulate the same historic vehicle, it may happen that both use the same parts and filenames. Better is 'MyAddonNameReadMe.txt. ReadMe.txt, not so much. Otherwise it may overwrite other important existing files.
 
 
[[Category: Articles]]
 
[[Category:Add-ons|Add-on etiq]]
 

Please note that all contributions to OrbiterWiki are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.2 (see OrbiterWiki:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following hCaptcha:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)