Editing Category talk:Glossary
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
--[[User:Urwumpe|Urwumpe]] 30 July 2005 19:07 (MSD) : I don't think so. A glossary is always a short explanation of terms, so its a nice way to keep a small subset of the page as glossary. Eg, i don't want to have a complete article about Cape Canaveral in the Glossary - but a short explanation what and where it is makes sense. | --[[User:Urwumpe|Urwumpe]] 30 July 2005 19:07 (MSD) : I don't think so. A glossary is always a short explanation of terms, so its a nice way to keep a small subset of the page as glossary. Eg, i don't want to have a complete article about Cape Canaveral in the Glossary - but a short explanation what and where it is makes sense. | ||
− | I agree, but this is a category, and thus can only show links to other pages, you can't include a short defenition with each link. A glossary would be better done like the [[List of Acronyms and Abbreviations]]. Having a category "Glossary" is rediculous, and it needs to be deleted. But I would be more than happy to see a page devoted to a Glossary. [[User: | + | I agree, but this is a category, and thus can only show links to other pages, you can't include a short defenition with each link. A glossary would be better done like the [[List of Acronyms and Abbreviations]]. Having a category "Glossary" is rediculous, and it needs to be deleted. But I would be more than happy to see a page devoted to a Glossary. [[User:70.152.171.170|70.152.171.170]] 1 August 2005 03:32 (MSD) |
− | |||
− |