Editing OrbiterWiki:Village pump
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Just a page for general OrbiterWiki discussions (for keeping the [[Talk:Main Page]] related to the main page). | Just a page for general OrbiterWiki discussions (for keeping the [[Talk:Main Page]] related to the main page). | ||
− | View archived discussions for [[OrbiterWiki:Village pump/Archive 2005-2007|2005-2007]], [[OrbiterWiki:Village pump/Archive 2008-2010|2008-2010 | + | View archived discussions for [[OrbiterWiki:Village pump/Archive 2005-2007|2005-2007]], [[OrbiterWiki:Village pump/Archive 2008-2010|2008-2010]]. |
<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:OrbiterWiki:Village pump|action=edit§ion=new}} Add a new thread]</span> | <span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:OrbiterWiki:Village pump|action=edit§ion=new}} Add a new thread]</span> | ||
− | == | + | == Server move and stuff == |
− | + | * OrbiterWiki has moved servers. Please report any and all issues you observe, preferably by email. | |
+ | * I am planning to upgrade to the most recent MediaWiki version shortly. Will notify when that's done. | ||
+ | * I'd like to try out the new default MediaWiki skin, which is the skin Wikipedia uses now. Any objections should be expressed here. | ||
+ | * I'm still hoping to switch case-insensitivity for titles back on. One day... | ||
+ | --[[User:RaMan|RaMan]] 12:50, 16 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
− | + | : Updated to MediaWiki v1.16.2; a couple of extensions got upgraded too. --[[User:RaMan|RaMan]] 03:54, 20 February 2011 (UTC) | |
+ | : Enabled Vector skin. [[Media:SkinOld.png|Old skin]] vs [[Media:SkinNew.png|New skin]]. Hope you like! --[[User:RaMan|RaMan]] 18:00, 20 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
− | + | == Loose gun policy for bans from a special subnet == | |
− | + | I just noticed some more similarities among the recent spambot activity here: Ten spambot accounts with two name patterns since December came from 118.101.0.0/16, one half of the Internet provider "TELEKOM MALAYSIA BERHAD" (There is no spam from the other /16 of this provider). I suspect that we have a single source behind varying IP addresses there. Since this still means a 640/650 chance that somebody is not a spammer from this network, I would propose the following guideline for next 3 months: All new user accounts that are registered from this network with the pattern | |
− | + | <Letter> + <Random First Name> + <Random Common Family Name> + <Letter> | |
− | + | should be banned instantly and for infinite time. IP-Bans should be avoided, since a /16 network of DHCP addresses seems like a poor target for IP-bans. Better target the business model and prevent search engine optimization. I don't see any reason to use this user name pattern here anyway. Another pattern had been the "-Steamer" type, but I don't think this alone is a good way to identify a spammer. If it comes from the same subnet though, it would be with very high certainty a spammer. We have no legal edits from the whole /16 subnet (Booo!). | |
− | |||
− | + | [[User:Urwumpe|Urwumpe]] 18:23, 30 January 2012 (UTC) | |
− | |||
− | It is | + | PS: Yes, that means that new users should better not use this name pattern, if they would like to prevent getting under general suspicion here. It is not nice, but since 2 hours of reaction time is enough to infect a few thousand PCs with malware, a fair price IMHO. "JohnSmith" would still be legal. "GJohnSmithj" would be dubious. |
− | + | : I suppose this sounds reasonable. No problem with this. Good effort noticing this! [[User:RaMan|RaMan]] 13:34, 2 February 2012 (UTC) | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | ==Increase Autoblock time== | |
− | I | + | I just noticed that the automatic IP block when blocking a registered user and his IP is just 24 hours, which explains why it was so ineffective against spambots in the past. I would suggest increasing this timespan to a week. That is still pretty short for our cases, and should also work against retries from dedicated hosts. [[User:Urwumpe|Urwumpe]] 17:52, 24 February 2012 (UTC) |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |