Editing Talk:transponder
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
: If you limit '''transponder''' to ATC, you are right, but spacecraft and launchers also use a similar system for aiding tracking (not only the telemetry stream, but also radar transponders). A transponder in reality is nothing else, but a transceiver, which responds to a defined query with a defined answer - for ATC with a sqawk code, for orbiter with vessel name and state vector information. There is no need for the transponder to be radar based or like the ATC we know from flight sims - thats all just special cases of a general transponder. --[[User:Urwumpe|Urwumpe]] 18:25, 2 April 2006 (MSD) | : If you limit '''transponder''' to ATC, you are right, but spacecraft and launchers also use a similar system for aiding tracking (not only the telemetry stream, but also radar transponders). A transponder in reality is nothing else, but a transceiver, which responds to a defined query with a defined answer - for ATC with a sqawk code, for orbiter with vessel name and state vector information. There is no need for the transponder to be radar based or like the ATC we know from flight sims - thats all just special cases of a general transponder. --[[User:Urwumpe|Urwumpe]] 18:25, 2 April 2006 (MSD) | ||
− | |||
− |