Difference between revisions of "Talk:IRC"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Agentgonzo (talk | contribs) (Created page with 'As a curious bystander, what was the reason for revoking rule 5? ~~~~') |
m (moved Talk:IRC(old) to Talk:IRC over redirect) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ==Rule 5/Recommended Language== | ||
| + | |||
As a curious bystander, what was the reason for revoking rule 5? [[User:Agentgonzo|Agentgonzo]] 10:33, 9 April 2009 (UTC) | As a curious bystander, what was the reason for revoking rule 5? [[User:Agentgonzo|Agentgonzo]] 10:33, 9 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | : The simple fact that this rule was never approved by the server operators. All active operators at the moment, the rule got written here, actually refused to have such a rule, but this did not keep the original editor from adding it anyway and despite getting told that such a rule will never exist. The rule got also not revoked, just it's claimed existence in OrbiterWiki. There was never a rule 5 in reality. --[[User:Urwumpe|Urwumpe]] 17:07, 9 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:53, 29 July 2010
Rule 5/Recommended Language[edit]
As a curious bystander, what was the reason for revoking rule 5? Agentgonzo 10:33, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- The simple fact that this rule was never approved by the server operators. All active operators at the moment, the rule got written here, actually refused to have such a rule, but this did not keep the original editor from adding it anyway and despite getting told that such a rule will never exist. The rule got also not revoked, just it's claimed existence in OrbiterWiki. There was never a rule 5 in reality. --Urwumpe 17:07, 9 April 2009 (UTC)