Difference between revisions of "Category talk:realistic-futuristic addons"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Proposed deletion) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | I quite agree. We should have a category for fictional spacecraft using existing technology, and a category for Sci-Fi, and leave it at that. --[[User:GW Simulations|GW_Simulations]] 23:29, 17 March 2006 (MSK) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:29, 17 March 2006
I propose this category deleted as it makes no sense.
Who's to say what's realistic in the future? Why not ENTERPRISE from Star Trek, for example? We *might* invent warp drive in the same way we *might* invent a DG engine.
If it's not sci-fi or realistic, leave it out of a category and the implication will be obvious.
--BadWolf 18:53, 17 March 2006 (MSK)
I quite agree. We should have a category for fictional spacecraft using existing technology, and a category for Sci-Fi, and leave it at that. --GW_Simulations 23:29, 17 March 2006 (MSK)