|
|
(18 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | Ultimately, we're going to have to come up with a set of procedures, processes, and guidelines for use if this isn't going to devolve into mass chaos. As I doubt the community that arises around this wiki will be nowhere near the size of the one that grew around Wikipedia, it won't need nearly the complexity, but we will need something. [[User:Kmweber|Kmweber]] 2 August 2005 02:45 (MSD)
| + | ==Adding random page== |
− | | |
| Can we add the "random page" link to the nav bar which seems to be standard in every wiki except this one. That's one of my favourite features of wikis. -- [[User:GIR|GIR]] 28 August 2005 22:28 (MSD) | | Can we add the "random page" link to the nav bar which seems to be standard in every wiki except this one. That's one of my favourite features of wikis. -- [[User:GIR|GIR]] 28 August 2005 22:28 (MSD) |
− |
| |
− | ==Where to place vessel development tutorials?==
| |
− |
| |
− | I could write a lot of tutorials about the funky stuff, like autopilots or animations codes, but my problem is, what is the best location for it. SDK documentation does not look right for me, tools is also wrong. Maybe we could create a section like "DLL tutorials" with a subsection "design pattern for vessels"?
| |
− |
| |
− | Also i currently have a small little capsule project on my workbench, which is quite nice for explaining some basic things of how to use anim8or for orbiter. --[[User:Urwumpe|Urwumpe]] 3 August 2005 14:44 (MSD)
| |
− |
| |
− | Urwumpe,
| |
− | created a new site: [[Addon Tutorials]]. This could be the place to put tutorials. Feel free to structurize and organize the site. created also a link to it on the main page. [[http://orbit.m6.net/v2/read.asp?id=25079 This thread]] can be used for discussions too.
| |
− |
| |
− |
| |
− | ==Where are the admins?==
| |
− |
| |
− | Currently rolling back a defacement takes only 1 minute, but this minute could be used better IMHO. I think it would be better the admin(s) get back on doing their job and at least IP ban Casper - come on, its always the same IP, thats too easy to be true. Alternativly i would recommend appointing some moderators or how it is called in a wiki. --[[User:Urwumpe|Urwumpe]] 6 October 2005 09:03 (MSD)
| |
− |
| |
− | == They're banned ==
| |
− |
| |
− | Sorry I wasn't paying enough attention :) The two IPs are now banned. [[User:RaMan|RaMan]] 6 October 2005 13:08 (MSD)
| |
− |
| |
− | ==OrbiterWiki moved==
| |
− |
| |
− | OrbiterWiki was unaccessible for about 45 minutes, which I suppose can be called a success given that this wiki is not heavily loaded. The old URL forwards to this wiki now. www.orbiterwiki.com is fully aliased with www.orbiterwiki.org, which may cause some confusion. I'm not sure what to do about this yet. Should I just forward .com to .org? -- [[User:RaMan|RaMan]] 02:44, 22 December 2005 (MSK)
| |
− |
| |
− | Oh, I forgot to mention that MathML is currently not available. We hope to get this set up and running ASAP. -- [[User:RaMan|RaMan]] 02:45, 22 December 2005 (MSK)
| |
| | | |
| | | |
Line 46: |
Line 21: |
| [[User:Ozone|Ozone]] 00:18, 26 April 2006 (MSD) Why was the main page reverted? | | [[User:Ozone|Ozone]] 00:18, 26 April 2006 (MSD) Why was the main page reverted? |
| | | |
− | == Article quality ==
| |
− |
| |
− | I think we should start, paying at least a bit attention to article quality for some favorite articles. Currently, we run well on copying stuff from wikipedia, but i especially miss more photos, drawings or other visual information which we could use. [[User:Urwumpe|Urwumpe]] 11:48, 26 April 2006 (MSD)
| |
− |
| |
− | == Math formulas ==
| |
| | | |
− | I would appreciate being able to use standard wiki math notation, but this wiki is not quite configured for that. For example, <math>f=ma\!</math>.
| |
− |
| |
− | I run my own wiki, and know how to set this up, so if you need any help, let me know. Or, just tell me not to do that and I will bother you no further about it. [[User:Kwan3217|Kwan3217]] 00:20, 3 June 2006 (MSD)
| |
− |
| |
− | * Can't compile ocaml... Any help will be appreciated. After a few files are compiled successfully, I get the following error:
| |
− | boot/ocamlrun boot/ocamlc -nostdlib -I boot -warn-error A -I utils -I parsing -I typing -I bytecomp -I asmcomp -I driver -I toplevel -c utils/misc.ml
| |
− | File "utils/misc.ml", line 1, characters 0-1:
| |
− | Could not find the .cmi file for interface utils/misc.mli.
| |
− | gmake: *** [utils/misc.cmo] Error 2
| |
− | Everything else is in place, so as soon as ocaml and texvc are built, we'll have MathML. [[User:RaMan|RaMan]] 18:07, 9 July 2006 (MSD)
| |
− |
| |
− | <!-- restore these if you feel I'm being unfair in removing them ;) [[User:RaMan|RaMan]] 15:53, 7 July 2006 (MSD)
| |
− |
| |
− | * Oops, I didn't see the comment above about this. [[User:Kwan3217|Kwan3217]] 00:21, 3 June 2006 (MSD)
| |
− |
| |
− | You could use images. --<font color="#002222">[[User:GW Simulations|'''GW_Simulations''']]</font><sub>''[[User talk:GW_Simulations|Talk]] ''|'' [[Special:Contributions/GW_Simulations|Contribs]]'' | ''[[Special:Emailuser/GW_Simulations|E-mail]]''</sub> 00:32, 8 June 2006 (MSD)
| |
− | -->
| |
| | | |
| == Random page does not work properly == | | == Random page does not work properly == |
Line 84: |
Line 37: |
| * Fixed. The page_random field was reset to 0 for some reason. [[User:RaMan|RaMan]] | | * Fixed. The page_random field was reset to 0 for some reason. [[User:RaMan|RaMan]] |
| | | |
− | == Orbiter-style wiki skin == | + | == Protection == |
− | | |
− | It would be nice to have a special Orbiter-style skin for this wiki. I don't have the artistic skills to create one, but if anyone feels like making one, I'll certainly add it to the list of selectable skins. If people like it we can even make the new skin the default.
| |
| | | |
− | I quite like the current logo (because it's colorful :D) but perhaps it would look better with a shuttle or some other spacecraft overlayed over Earth? Any ideas / sketches / finished designs are welcome. [[User:RaMan|RaMan]] 19:29, 10 July 2006 (MSD) | + | I suggest we protect the Main Page. It's the primary target for defacement, but it's also the first thing a visitor sees when they enter the site. It's not very nice if they are presented with a defaced page. Surely they'll feel that the site is neglected. Any opinions? --[[User:RaMan|RaMan]] 14:12, 26 July 2006 (MSD) |
| | | |
− | What about placing the ISS or the DG over earth, right into the center of the logo? For the other colors, i like the current lightweight style, but i am open for ideas as long as it does not get too dark. For some categories and templates, we could need some small icons, thats a large construction site currently. [[User:Urwumpe|Urwumpe]] 11:18, 11 July 2006 (MSD)
| + | * I don't think its a bad idea, but it makes it of course harder for users for adding new content. So, if we do this and protect it, i would propose improving the layout of the main page to something more appealing and create a set of "portals" where any user can add content, for a special topic. So new pages can still be found, while main page does only get maybe one update per week. What about a "picture of the week" and an "article of the week" on main page? maybe we could motivate people to work more on their addon articles and tutorials. --[[User:Urwumpe|Urwumpe]] 14:32, 26 July 2006 (MSD) |
| | | |
− | == Template links ==
| + | * Please take a look at [[Main Page/New]]. I'll swap it for the current main page soon; express your opinions now! --[[User:RaMan|RaMan]] 18:58, 29 July 2006 (MSD) |
| | | |
− | I've set up the template linking to use {{tl|tl}} as on WP. I have protected the template to avoid vandalism --<font color="#002222">[[User:GW Simulations|'''GW_Simulations''']]</font><sub>''[[User talk:GW_Simulations|Talk]] ''|'' [[Special:Contributions/GW_Simulations|Contribs]]'' | ''[[Special:Emailuser/GW_Simulations|E-mail]]''</sub> 01:21, 11 July 2006 (MSD)
| + | ** i like it, all critism i see is the title, maybe we should replace it with a tiny banner, so it does not look too "empty" on the screen. --[[User:Urwumpe|Urwumpe]] 22:16, 29 July 2006 (MSD) |
Adding random page[edit]
Can we add the "random page" link to the nav bar which seems to be standard in every wiki except this one. That's one of my favourite features of wikis. -- GIR 28 August 2005 22:28 (MSD)
"Orbiter Forum" re-directs to the wrong page. It should go to
http://orbit.m6.net/Forum/default.aspx
and not
http://orbit.m6.net/v2/boardtalk.asp
which is the historical one.
-MatW
- Urwumpe has raised this with the sysadmin. --BadWolf 15:54, 20 March 2006 (MSK)
Ozone 00:18, 26 April 2006 (MSD) Why was the main page reverted?
Random page does not work properly[edit]
The current page function seems to have a bug currently - i only can find thge articles CCAFS and the main page. --Urwumpe 01:29, 29 June 2006 (MSD)
- Fixed. The page_random field was reset to 0 for some reason. RaMan
Protection[edit]
I suggest we protect the Main Page. It's the primary target for defacement, but it's also the first thing a visitor sees when they enter the site. It's not very nice if they are presented with a defaced page. Surely they'll feel that the site is neglected. Any opinions? --RaMan 14:12, 26 July 2006 (MSD)
- I don't think its a bad idea, but it makes it of course harder for users for adding new content. So, if we do this and protect it, i would propose improving the layout of the main page to something more appealing and create a set of "portals" where any user can add content, for a special topic. So new pages can still be found, while main page does only get maybe one update per week. What about a "picture of the week" and an "article of the week" on main page? maybe we could motivate people to work more on their addon articles and tutorials. --Urwumpe 14:32, 26 July 2006 (MSD)
- Please take a look at Main Page/New. I'll swap it for the current main page soon; express your opinions now! --RaMan 18:58, 29 July 2006 (MSD)
- i like it, all critism i see is the title, maybe we should replace it with a tiny banner, so it does not look too "empty" on the screen. --Urwumpe 22:16, 29 July 2006 (MSD)