Difference between revisions of "User talk:GW Simulations"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (R/V Vandalism) |
m (Reverted edits by 74.208.11.169 (Talk); changed back to last version by Urwumpe) |
||
| (12 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | '''Please feel free to leave comments here''' --[[User:GW Simulations|GW_Simulations]] 17:34, 26 March 2006 (MSD) | |
== Server Problem? == | == Server Problem? == | ||
Whenever I go onto any page other that this one, I get a "new messages" message, but when I come here, there are no new messages. Can anyone help? --[[User:GW Simulations|GW_Simulations]] 22:11, 28 March 2006 (MSD) | Whenever I go onto any page other that this one, I get a "new messages" message, but when I come here, there are no new messages. Can anyone help? --[[User:GW Simulations|GW_Simulations]] 22:11, 28 March 2006 (MSD) | ||
| + | **Finally fixed it. Someone had deleted a previous version of the page. I have restored it, and it is now working. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == VAND3 for spammers == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Don't waste the VAND3 for professional spammers or spambots - they won't care about the one month ban, you can directly permamently ban them, if you like. I think about stopping banning them and instead just update the spam black list for making it harder for them by attacking the rarest resource of them: server domains. [[User:Urwumpe|Urwumpe]] 16:54, 16 July 2006 (MSD) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:13, 11 November 2007
Please feel free to leave comments here --GW_Simulations 17:34, 26 March 2006 (MSD)
Server Problem?[edit]
Whenever I go onto any page other that this one, I get a "new messages" message, but when I come here, there are no new messages. Can anyone help? --GW_Simulations 22:11, 28 March 2006 (MSD)
- Finally fixed it. Someone had deleted a previous version of the page. I have restored it, and it is now working.
VAND3 for spammers[edit]
Don't waste the VAND3 for professional spammers or spambots - they won't care about the one month ban, you can directly permamently ban them, if you like. I think about stopping banning them and instead just update the spam black list for making it harder for them by attacking the rarest resource of them: server domains. Urwumpe 16:54, 16 July 2006 (MSD)