Difference between revisions of "Talk:World of 2001"
(Thoughts & Kudos) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is this project still active? It's website appears to be defunct. —[[User:82.203.134.115|82.203.134.115]] 15:28, 6 November 2007 (MSK) | Is this project still active? It's website appears to be defunct. —[[User:82.203.134.115|82.203.134.115]] 15:28, 6 November 2007 (MSK) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :AFAIK it is still active, the homepage is just no longer up. No idea why. --[[User:Urwumpe|Urwumpe]] 17:17, 6 November 2007 (MSK) | ||
| + | |||
| + | It might make sense to let the Orbiter users know that of this page. It'll allow them to pull their involvement together in the World of 2001 . . . | ||
| + | |||
| + | It really seems as if we've unfortunately moved into an actual, different timeline, due to the earlier politics & lack of will. And here, the manned space effort may have broadened partly due to the design & production of far more efficient engines & less expensive, less volatile & less volumetric fuels. Maybe this might be mentioned. | ||
| + | |||
| + | It's a tad disconcerting to dream of what might've been, but mind-boggling to see it laid out so competently & expertly in this project, Orbiter and all the links. Amazing stuff, guys. -- PFS 29 July 2008 | ||
Latest revision as of 17:22, 29 July 2008
Is this project still active? It's website appears to be defunct. —82.203.134.115 15:28, 6 November 2007 (MSK)
- AFAIK it is still active, the homepage is just no longer up. No idea why. --Urwumpe 17:17, 6 November 2007 (MSK)
It might make sense to let the Orbiter users know that of this page. It'll allow them to pull their involvement together in the World of 2001 . . .
It really seems as if we've unfortunately moved into an actual, different timeline, due to the earlier politics & lack of will. And here, the manned space effort may have broadened partly due to the design & production of far more efficient engines & less expensive, less volatile & less volumetric fuels. Maybe this might be mentioned.
It's a tad disconcerting to dream of what might've been, but mind-boggling to see it laid out so competently & expertly in this project, Orbiter and all the links. Amazing stuff, guys. -- PFS 29 July 2008