Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Realistic add-ons"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(CNFD) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Deletion== | ==Deletion== | ||
The name is open ended and the content type confusing. It should be deleted and replaced by two categories: - ''Real'' and ''Ficticious but possible with today's technology'' - obviously the names will need tweaking. --[[User:GW Simulations|GW_Simulations]] 19:42, 18 March 2006 (MSK) | The name is open ended and the content type confusing. It should be deleted and replaced by two categories: - ''Real'' and ''Ficticious but possible with today's technology'' - obviously the names will need tweaking. --[[User:GW Simulations|GW_Simulations]] 19:42, 18 March 2006 (MSK) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | I disagree, I don't think there's a need to differentiate between, say, Soyuz TMA and Hotol on the basis that one was never built. Realisitc should be defined in its header as meaning realisitc with today's technology, though, not realistic if you presume carbon nano-tubes can be made that are 30,000km long, etc. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:BadWolf|BadWolf]] 20:32, 18 March 2006 (MSK) | ||
| + | ---- | ||
Revision as of 17:32, 18 March 2006
Deletion
The name is open ended and the content type confusing. It should be deleted and replaced by two categories: - Real and Ficticious but possible with today's technology - obviously the names will need tweaking. --GW_Simulations 19:42, 18 March 2006 (MSK)
I disagree, I don't think there's a need to differentiate between, say, Soyuz TMA and Hotol on the basis that one was never built. Realisitc should be defined in its header as meaning realisitc with today's technology, though, not realistic if you presume carbon nano-tubes can be made that are 30,000km long, etc.
--BadWolf 20:32, 18 March 2006 (MSK)