Difference between revisions of "User talk:Ozone"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (revert vandalism) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Can you please do a bit more, than just linking to the wikipedia articles? To me, this looks like gap filling at all costs and looks rather unprofessional. I would prefer at least having a tiny article, before you link to the wikipedia as source. I will create a template an category to mark articles which need content in the mean time. The english wikipedia articles are also under the same license as orbiterwiki, so you can just copy the articles AFAIK. [[User:Urwumpe|Urwumpe]] 13:08, 4 March 2006 (MSK) | Can you please do a bit more, than just linking to the wikipedia articles? To me, this looks like gap filling at all costs and looks rather unprofessional. I would prefer at least having a tiny article, before you link to the wikipedia as source. I will create a template an category to mark articles which need content in the mean time. The english wikipedia articles are also under the same license as orbiterwiki, so you can just copy the articles AFAIK. [[User:Urwumpe|Urwumpe]] 13:08, 4 March 2006 (MSK) | ||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 18:02, 5 May 2006
Linking to wikipedia[edit]
Can you please do a bit more, than just linking to the wikipedia articles? To me, this looks like gap filling at all costs and looks rather unprofessional. I would prefer at least having a tiny article, before you link to the wikipedia as source. I will create a template an category to mark articles which need content in the mean time. The english wikipedia articles are also under the same license as orbiterwiki, so you can just copy the articles AFAIK. Urwumpe 13:08, 4 March 2006 (MSK)